Spectral risk objectives - also called $L$-risks - allow for learning systems to interpolate between optimizing average-case performance (as in empirical risk minimization) and worst-case performance on a task. We develop stochastic algorithms to optimize these quantities by characterizing their subdifferential and addressing challenges such as biasedness of subgradient estimates and non-smoothness of the objective. We show theoretically and experimentally that out-of-the-box approaches such as stochastic subgradient and dual averaging are hindered by bias and that our approach outperforms them.

最近的立法导致对机器学习的兴趣，即从预测模型中删除特定的培训样本，就好像它们在培训数据集中从未存在。由于损坏/对抗性数据或仅仅是用户的更新隐私要求，也可能需要进行学习。对于不需要培训的模型（K-NN），只需删除最近的原始样品即可有效。但是，这个想法不适合学习更丰富的表示的模型。由于模型维度D的趋势，最新的想法利用了基于优化的更新，因为损失函数的Hessian颠倒了。我们使用新的条件独立系数L-CODEC的变体来识别模型参数的子集，其语义重叠在单个样本级别上。我们的方法完全避免了将（可能）巨大矩阵倒置的必要性。通过利用马尔可夫毯子的选择，我们前提是l-codec也适合深度学习以及视觉中的其他应用。与替代方案相比，L-Codec在原本是不可行的设置中可以实现近似学习，包括用于面部识别的视觉模型，人重新识别和可能需要未经学习的样品进行排除的NLP模型。代码可以在https://github.com/vsingh-group/lcodec-deep-unlearning/

什么是学习？ 20美元^ {st} Centure的学习理论形式化 - 这是人工智能中沉淀的革命 - 主要是在$ \ mathit {in-diversion} $学习，即在假设训练数据被取样的假设下学习与评估分布相同的分配。这种假设使这些理论不足以表征21美元^ $ {st} MENTURE的现实世界数据问题，其通常是通过与培训数据分布（称为公共学习）不同的评估分布来表征。因此，我们通过放松这种假设来对现有可读性的正式定义进行小小的变化。然后，我们介绍$ \ MATHBF {学习\效率} $（LE）来量化学习者能够利用给定问题的数据的金额，无论它是一个或分发的问题如何。然后，我们定义并证明了可读性的广义概念之间的关系，并展示了该框架是如何足够一般的，以表征传输，多任务，元，持续和终身学习。我们希望本统一有助于弥合现实世界问题的实证实践与理论指导之间的差距。最后，因为生物学学习继续胜过机器学习算法的某些挑战，我们讨论了这一框架VI的局限性 - \'A-is-is-is-is-is-is-is-vis，它的形式化生物学学习能力，旨在为未来研究的多个途径。

决策森林（森林），尤其是随机森林和梯度促进树木，与许多监督学习场景中的其他方法相比，已经证明了最先进的准确性。尤其是，森林在表格数据中占主导地位，即当特征空间非结构化时，因此信号是特征指数置换的不变性。然而，在存在于多种多样（例如图像，文本和语音）深网（网络）（特别是卷积深网（Convnets））上的结构化数据中，倾向于优于森林。我们猜想至少部分原因是网络的输入不仅仅是特征幅度，也是其索引。相反，天真的森林实施未能明确考虑特征指数。最近提出的森林方法表明，对于每个节点，森林从某些特定分布中隐式采样一个随机矩阵。这些森林像某些类别的网络一样，通过将特征空间划分为对应于线性函数的凸多物体来学习。我们以这种方法为基础，并表明人们可以以多种感知方式选择分布来纳入特征区域。我们在数据上活在三个不同的流形上的数据上证明了经验性能：圆环，图像和时间序列。此外，我们证明了其在多元模拟环境中的强度，并且在预测癫痫患者的手术结果方面也表现出了优越性，并从非运动脑区域的原始立体定向EEG数据中预测运动方向。在所有模拟和真实数据中，歧管随机森林（MORF）算法的表现优于忽略特征空间结构并挑战Convnets的性能。此外，MORF运行迅速，并保持解释性和理论上的理由。

State-of-the-art automatic augmentation methods (e.g., AutoAugment and RandAugment) for visual recognition tasks diversify training data using a large set of augmentation operations. The range of magnitudes of many augmentation operations (e.g., brightness and contrast) is continuous. Therefore, to make search computationally tractable, these methods use fixed and manually-defined magnitude ranges for each operation, which may lead to sub-optimal policies. To answer the open question on the importance of magnitude ranges for each augmentation operation, we introduce RangeAugment that allows us to efficiently learn the range of magnitudes for individual as well as composite augmentation operations. RangeAugment uses an auxiliary loss based on image similarity as a measure to control the range of magnitudes of augmentation operations. As a result, RangeAugment has a single scalar parameter for search, image similarity, which we simply optimize via linear search. RangeAugment integrates seamlessly with any model and learns model- and task-specific augmentation policies. With extensive experiments on the ImageNet dataset across different networks, we show that RangeAugment achieves competitive performance to state-of-the-art automatic augmentation methods with 4-5 times fewer augmentation operations. Experimental results on semantic segmentation, object detection, foundation models, and knowledge distillation further shows RangeAugment's effectiveness.

Differentiable Search Indices (DSIs) encode a corpus of documents in the parameters of a model and use the same model to map queries directly to relevant document identifiers. Despite the strong performance of DSI models, deploying them in situations where the corpus changes over time is computationally expensive because reindexing the corpus requires re-training the model. In this work, we introduce DSI++, a continual learning challenge for DSI to incrementally index new documents while being able to answer queries related to both previously and newly indexed documents. Across different model scales and document identifier representations, we show that continual indexing of new documents leads to considerable forgetting of previously indexed documents. We also hypothesize and verify that the model experiences forgetting events during training, leading to unstable learning. To mitigate these issues, we investigate two approaches. The first focuses on modifying the training dynamics. Flatter minima implicitly alleviate forgetting, so we optimize for flatter loss basins and show that the model stably memorizes more documents (+12\%). Next, we introduce a generative memory to sample pseudo-queries for documents and supplement them during continual indexing to prevent forgetting for the retrieval task. Extensive experiments on novel continual indexing benchmarks based on Natural Questions (NQ) and MS MARCO demonstrate that our proposed solution mitigates forgetting by a significant margin. Concretely, it improves the average Hits@10 by $+21.1\%$ over competitive baselines for NQ and requires $6$ times fewer model updates compared to re-training the DSI model for incrementally indexing five corpora in a sequence.

Many real-world reinforcement learning tasks require control of complex dynamical systems that involve both costly data acquisition processes and large state spaces. In cases where the transition dynamics can be readily evaluated at specified states (e.g., via a simulator), agents can operate in what is often referred to as planning with a \emph{generative model}. We propose the AE-LSVI algorithm for best-policy identification, a novel variant of the kernelized least-squares value iteration (LSVI) algorithm that combines optimism with pessimism for active exploration (AE). AE-LSVI provably identifies a near-optimal policy \emph{uniformly} over an entire state space and achieves polynomial sample complexity guarantees that are independent of the number of states. When specialized to the recently introduced offline contextual Bayesian optimization setting, our algorithm achieves improved sample complexity bounds. Experimentally, we demonstrate that AE-LSVI outperforms other RL algorithms in a variety of environments when robustness to the initial state is required.

Spurious correlations in training data often lead to robustness issues since models learn to use them as shortcuts. For example, when predicting whether an object is a cow, a model might learn to rely on its green background, so it would do poorly on a cow on a sandy background. A standard dataset for measuring state-of-the-art on methods mitigating this problem is Waterbirds. The best method (Group Distributionally Robust Optimization - GroupDRO) currently achieves 89\% worst group accuracy and standard training from scratch on raw images only gets 72\%. GroupDRO requires training a model in an end-to-end manner with subgroup labels. In this paper, we show that we can achieve up to 90\% accuracy without using any sub-group information in the training set by simply using embeddings from a large pre-trained vision model extractor and training a linear classifier on top of it. With experiments on a wide range of pre-trained models and pre-training datasets, we show that the capacity of the pre-training model and the size of the pre-training dataset matters. Our experiments reveal that high capacity vision transformers perform better compared to high capacity convolutional neural networks, and larger pre-training dataset leads to better worst-group accuracy on the spurious correlation dataset.

A reliable critic is central to on-policy actor-critic learning. But it becomes challenging to learn a reliable critic in a multi-agent sparse reward scenario due to two factors: 1) The joint action space grows exponentially with the number of agents 2) This, combined with the reward sparseness and environment noise, leads to large sample requirements for accurate learning. We show that regularising the critic with spectral normalization (SN) enables it to learn more robustly, even in multi-agent on-policy sparse reward scenarios. Our experiments show that the regularised critic is quickly able to learn from the sparse rewarding experience in the complex SMAC and RWARE domains. These findings highlight the importance of regularisation in the critic for stable learning.

Sequence models based on linear state spaces (SSMs) have recently emerged as a promising choice of architecture for modeling long range dependencies across various modalities. However, they invariably rely on discretization of a continuous state space, which complicates their presentation and understanding. In this work, we dispose of the discretization step, and propose a model based on vanilla Diagonal Linear RNNs ($\mathrm{DLR}$). We empirically show that $\mathrm{DLR}$ is as performant as previously-proposed SSMs in the presence of strong supervision, despite being conceptually much simpler. Moreover, we characterize the expressivity of SSMs (including $\mathrm{DLR}$) and attention-based models via a suite of $13$ synthetic sequence-to-sequence tasks involving interactions over tens of thousands of tokens, ranging from simple operations, such as shifting an input sequence, to detecting co-dependent visual features over long spatial ranges in flattened images. We find that while SSMs report near-perfect performance on tasks that can be modeled via $\textit{few}$ convolutional kernels, they struggle on tasks requiring $\textit{many}$ such kernels and especially when the desired sequence manipulation is $\textit{context-dependent}$. For example, $\mathrm{DLR}$ learns to perfectly shift a $0.5M$-long input by an arbitrary number of positions but fails when the shift size depends on context. Despite these limitations, $\mathrm{DLR}$ reaches high performance on two higher-order reasoning tasks $\mathrm{ListOpsSubTrees}$ and $\mathrm{PathfinderSegmentation}\text{-}\mathrm{256}$ with input lengths $8K$ and $65K$ respectively, and gives encouraging performance on $\mathrm{PathfinderSegmentation}\text{-}\mathrm{512}$ with input length $262K$ for which attention is not a viable choice.